Glamorgan Stats
Glamorgan T20 Blast Economy Rate Stats
How many runs an over Glamorgan concede, and who bowls tightest, game by game
Updated 12 July 2026, after the Gloucestershire game
| Player | Avg | Hit % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glamorgan total | 8.81 | 9.65 | 9.63 | 10.85 | 8.05 | 9.20 | 7.65 | 10.05 | 8.40 | 10.10 | 8.55 | 7.90 | 8.25 | 7.01 | 8.75 | 11.69 | 10.40 | 5.90 | 8.70 | 7.86 | 7.45 | |
I. WasimAll-rounder, 8 bowled
|
7.16 | 63%5/8 | 6.004-24-1 | 9.754-39-0 | 10.004-40-1 | 5.254-21-1 | 4.254-17-1 | 7.254-29-0 | 9.004-36-1 | 5.754-23-3 | ||||||||||||
|
B
B. KellawayAll-rounder, 17 bowled
|
7.81 | 65%11/17 | 7.754-31-2 | 8.754-35-3 | 5.504-22-3 | 8.003-24-3 | 7.504-30-1 | 4.673-14-0 | 7.504-30-0 | 7.673-23-0 | 6.002-12-1 | 9.002-18-0 | 7.254-29-1 | 10.001-10-0 | -DNB | 6.002-12-2 | -DNB | 14.001-14-1 | -DNB | 18.001-18-0 | 6.000.4-4-0 | 15.001-15-0 |
M. CraneBowler, 15 bowled
|
7.82 | 60%9/15 | 11.504-46-2 | 7.504-30-1 | 12.333-37-0 | 6.004-24-2 | 8.754-35-1 | 6.004-24-4 | 6.004-24-0 | 10.504-42-3 | 4.004-16-2 | 6.254-25-0 | 7.004-28-0 | 11.673-35-0 | 10.333-31-0 | 7.254-29-0 | 5.004-20-4 | |||||
|
N
N. LeonardBowler, 12 bowled
|
8.32 | 67%8/12 | 16.673-50-1 | 7.754-31-1 | 9.004-36-2 | 8.003-24-0 | 7.754-31-2 | 5.504-22-2 | 9.504-38-2 | 11.754-47-1 | 6.504-26-4 | 6.254-25-5 | 4.502-9-0 | 6.754-27-2 | ||||||||
|
A
A. TribeKeeper, 3 bowled
|
8.33 | 67%2/3 | -DNB | -DNB | 14.001-14-0 | 5.001-5-0 | 6.001-6-0 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | |||||
|
A
A. GorvinAll-rounder, 8 bowled
|
8.95 | 13%1/8 | 8.754-35-1 | 8.333-25-0 | 10.333-31-1 | 8.504-34-3 | 14.213.1-45-0 | 9.754-39-0 | 4.254-17-4 | 8.673-26-1 | ||||||||||||
T. van der GugtenAll-rounder, 12 bowled
|
9.00 | 25%3/12 | 12.002-24-0 | 7.502-15-1 | 10.502-21-0 | 9.004-36-0 | 13.002-26-0 | 5.254-21-1 | 9.754-39-0 | 9.504-38-1 | 8.673-26-1 | 9.754-39-0 | 10.002-20-0 | 6.333-19-0 | ||||||||
D. DouthwaiteAll-rounder, 19 bowled
|
9.29 | 32%6/19 | 8.004-32-2 | 10.673-32-1 | 9.754-39-1 | 8.003-24-0 | 9.003-27-0 | 8.673-26-0 | 14.254-57-2 | 8.333-25-2 | 8.754-35-2 | 9.254-37-1 | 7.254-29-0 | 5.743.5-22-4 | 7.673-23-1 | 11.754-47-0 | 13.004-52-1 | 7.504-30-0 | 8.754-35-1 | 8.254-33-3 | 11.004-44-0 | |
J. NeeshamAll-rounder, 10 bowled
|
9.92 | 30%3/10 | 13.711.1-16-1 | 12.352.5-35-0 | 13.002-26-1 | 6.254-25-1 | 11.003-33-1 | 7.002-14-0 | 6.004-24-3 | 13.002-26-0 | 12.333-37-0 | 11.002-22-0 | ||||||||||
J. McIlroyBowler, 3 bowled
|
10.08 | 33%1/3 | 13.254-53-0 | 7.004-28-0 | 10.004-40-1 | |||||||||||||||||
N. McAndrewBowler, 10 bowled
|
10.35 | 10%1/10 | 12.502-25-1 | 11.333-34-0 | 13.504-54-2 | 14.333-43-1 | 9.673-29-1 | 9.504-38-2 | 11.003-33-1 | 9.754-39-2 | 10.504-42-0 | 3.754-15-4 | ||||||||||
F. FarooqiBowler, 2 bowled
|
9.00 | 0%0/2 | 9.504-38-2 | 8.504-34-4 |
A green cell is at or under the line. The line under an economy rate is the bowler's overs, runs and wickets; DNB did not bowl.
Glamorgan Team Economy
Line9
Avg8.819.01
Hit60%
Glamorgan Economy Match by Match
The last 20 T20 Blast matches and how often Glamorgan kept under the line
Line9
| Opponent | Result | For | Ag | <9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | 8.80 | 9.08 | 60% | |
 Gloucestershire (A)12 Jul |
Wby 50 runs | 9.65 | 11.75 | |
 Warwickshire (A)10 Jul |
Lby 4 wickets | 9.63 | 9.40 | |
 Northamptonshire (H)8 Jul |
Lby 53 runs | 10.85 | 8.86 | |
 Worcestershire (H)5 Jul |
Lby 15 runs | 8.05 | 7.55 | |
| Warwickshire (H)3 Jul |
Wby 7 wickets | 9.20 | 9.93 | |
 Middlesex (H)26 Jun |
Wby 6 wickets | 7.65 | 9.09 | |
 Lancashire (A)7 Jun |
Wby 2 wickets | 10.05 | 10.10 | |
| Worcestershire (A)5 Jun |
Lby 27 runs | 8.40 | 7.23 | |
 Somerset (A)4 Jun |
Wby 4 wickets | 10.10 | 10.15 | |
| Somerset (H)29 May |
Wby 7 wickets | 8.55 | 12.65 | |
| Gloucestershire (H)23 May |
Lby 2 wickets | 7.90 | 7.85 | |
| Northamptonshire (A)22 May |
Lby 3 runs | 8.25 | 8.10 | |
| Middlesex (H)18 Jul 2025 |
Wby 52 runs | 7.01 | 9.20 | |
| Gloucestershire (H)13 Jul 2025 |
Lby 40 runs | 8.75 | 7.43 | |
 Surrey (A)11 Jul 2025 |
Lby 6 wickets | 11.69 | 11.10 | |
 Hampshire (A)10 Jul 2025 |
Lby 95 runs | 10.40 | 6.00 | |
 Kent (H)6 Jul 2025 |
Wby 6 wickets | 5.90 | 10.46 | |
| Somerset (A)4 Jul 2025 |
Wby 2 runs | 8.70 | 8.80 | |
| Somerset (H)20 Jun 2025 |
Lby 6 wickets | 7.86 | 6.50 | |
| Gloucestershire (A)15 Jun 2025 |
Wby 40 runs | 7.45 | 9.45 |
Glamorgan Economy Lines
How often they kept under each line, last 20 T20 Blast matches
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 14 | 6 | 30% |
| 8.5 | 11 | 9 | 45% |
| 9 | 8 | 12 | 60% |
| 9.5 | 7 | 13 | 65% |
| 10 | 5 | 15 | 75% |
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|
Economy Batting First and Chasing
Glamorgan's economy rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 8 | 4 | 8.74 | 9.26 |
| Second | 12 | 6 | 8.85 | 8.96 |
T20B 2026 Economy Table
Economy rate, this season
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Worcestershire |
12 | 8.35 | 8.06 |
| 2Northamptonshire |
15 | 8.47 | 9.16 |
| 3Hampshire |
15 | 8.48 | 9.06 |
4 Durham |
12 | 8.50 | 8.92 |
| 5Surrey |
13 | 8.64 | 9.01 |
| 6Gloucestershire |
13 | 8.74 | 8.81 |
| 7Kent |
12 | 8.79 | 8.22 |
| 8Warwickshire |
12 | 8.83 | 9.15 |
9 Nottinghamshire |
14 | 8.85 | 8.85 |
10 Yorkshire |
13 | 8.89 | 9.30 |
11 Essex |
13 | 8.89 | 8.83 |
| 12Somerset |
14 | 8.99 | 9.29 |
| 13Glamorgan |
12 | 9.02 | 9.31 |
| 14Middlesex |
12 | 9.03 | 8.02 |
| 15Lancashire |
12 | 9.12 | 9.15 |
16 Leicestershire |
12 | 9.46 | 8.08 |
17 Derbyshire |
12 | 9.54 | 9.75 |
18 Sussex |
12 | 9.74 | 8.94 |
Glamorgan T20 Blast Economy Questions
What is Glamorgan's economy rate in T20 Blast matches?
Glamorgan's bowlers have conceded 8.81 runs an over in their last 20 T20 Blast matches, and Glamorgan have scored at 9.01 against them.
How often do Glamorgan concede under 9 an over?
Glamorgan conceded under 9 an over in 12 of their last 20 T20 Blast matches.
Who is Glamorgan's most economical bowler?
Over Glamorgan's last 20 T20 Blast matches, bowling three times or more: Imad Wasim (7.16 in 8 spells), Ben Kellaway (7.81 in 17 spells), Mason Crane (7.82 in 15 spells).