Essex Stats
Essex Team Economy
Essex Economy Match by Match
The last 10 T20 Blast matches and how often Essex kept under the line
| Opponent | Result | For | Ag | <8.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | 8.68 | 8.69 | 50% | |
| Lby 75 runs | 10.55 | 6.80 | ||
| Wby 8 wickets | 6.31 | 7.37 | ||
| Wby 7 wickets | 8.21 | 8.38 | ||
| Lby 4 wickets | 7.53 | 7.10 | ||
| Wby 100 runs | 5.94 | 10.20 | ||
| Lby 7 runs | 12.00 | 11.65 | ||
| Lby 130 runs | 11.90 | 8.10 | ||
| Wby 3 runs | 9.20 | 9.35 | ||
| Wby 60 runs | 6.50 | 8.80 | ||
| Wby 5 wickets | 8.65 | 9.10 |
Essex Economy Lines
How often they kept under each line, last 10 T20 Blast matches
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | 7 | 3 | 30% |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | 40% |
| 8.5 | 5 | 5 | 50% |
| 9 | 4 | 6 | 60% |
| 9.5 | 3 | 7 | 70% |
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|
Economy Batting First and Chasing
Essex's economy rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 4 | 3 | 7.29 | 8.86 |
| Second | 6 | 3 | 9.60 | 8.57 |
T20B 2026 Economy Table
Economy rate, this season
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
12 | 8.35 | 8.06 |
| 2 |
15 | 8.47 | 9.16 |
| 3 |
15 | 8.48 | 9.06 |
| 4 |
12 | 8.50 | 8.92 |
| 5 |
13 | 8.64 | 9.01 |
| 6 |
13 | 8.74 | 8.81 |
| 7 |
12 | 8.79 | 8.22 |
| 8 |
12 | 8.83 | 9.15 |
| 9 |
14 | 8.85 | 8.85 |
| 10 |
13 | 8.89 | 9.30 |
| 11 |
13 | 8.89 | 8.83 |
| 12 |
14 | 8.99 | 9.29 |
| 13 |
12 | 9.02 | 9.31 |
| 14 |
12 | 9.03 | 8.02 |
| 15 |
12 | 9.12 | 9.15 |
| 16 |
12 | 9.46 | 8.08 |
| 17 |
12 | 9.54 | 9.75 |
| 18 |
12 | 9.74 | 8.94 |
Essex T20 Blast Economy Questions
What is Essex's economy rate in T20 Blast matches?
Essex's bowlers have conceded 8.76 runs an over in their last 10 T20 Blast matches, and Essex have scored at 8.73 against them.
How often do Essex concede under 8.5 an over?
Essex conceded under 8.5 an over in 5 of their last 10 T20 Blast matches.
Who is Essex's most economical bowler?
Over Essex's last 10 T20 Blast matches, bowling three times or more: Samuel Cook (5.76 in 5 spells), Simon Harmer (6.91 in 10 spells), Wiaan Mulder (7.50 in 3 spells).