Amsterdam Flames Stats
Amsterdam Flames ETPL Cricket Economy Rate Stats
How many runs an over Amsterdam Flames concede, and who bowls tightest, game by game
Updated , after the Belfast Wolves game
| Player | Avg | Hit % | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amsterdam Flames total | 7.89 | 7.35 | 6.35 | 7.75 | 6.38 | 7.58 | 8.80 | 8.00 | 8.55 | 15.39 | 8.70 | |
M. BracewellAll-rounder, 9 bowled
|
5.56 | 100%9/9 | 5.004-20-2 | 5.004-20-1 | 3.504-14-3 | 3.004-12-5 | 6.673-20-2 | 7.504-30-3 | 6.254-25-1 | 7.504-30-2 | 7.001-7-0 | |
A. DuttAll-rounder, 8 bowled
|
6.14 | 100%8/8 | 4.754-19-1 | 5.504-22-1 | 7.504-30-0 | 7.004-28-1 | 5.754-23-1 | 7.004-28-2 | 5.004-20-0 | 8.001-8-1 | ||
T. PringleAll-rounder, 9 bowled
|
7.82 | 44%4/9 | 8.754-35-0 | 8.254-33-0 | 11.254-45-0 | 5.143.3-18-1 | 9.504-38-1 | 7.754-31-1 | 5.504-22-3 | 5.754-23-2 | 8.502-17-0 | |
B. de LeedeBatter, 8 bowled
|
7.82 | 63%5/8 | 6.333-19-0 | 3.271.5-6-4 | -DNB | 8.002-16-0 | 6.002-12-0 | 8.254-33-0 | 10.502-21-0 | 11.003-33-1 | -DNB | 7.502-15-0 |
D. PayneBowler, 7 bowled
|
7.97 | 71%5/7 | 10.573.3-37-0 | 6.754-27-3 | 8.004-32-3 | 5.333-16-1 | 6.333-19-0 | 14.181.5-26-0 | 7.254-29-0 | |||
C. CampherAll-rounder, 7 bowled
|
9.54 | 29%2/7 | -DNB | 8.502-17-1 | 8.254-33-3 | 7.001-7-0 | 8.001-8-0 | -DNB | 11.502-23-0 | 9.001-9-0 | 13.502-27-0 | |
K. KleinBowler, 3 bowled
|
9.57 | 0%0/3 | 11.502-23-1 | 10.001-10-0 | 8.504-34-3 | |||||||
R. GleesonBowler, 5 bowled
|
12.59 | 0%0/5 | 14.254-57-0 | 9.504-38-2 | 14.673-44-0 | 24.001-24-0 | 8.843.1-28-1 | |||||
T. DavidBatter, 1 bowled
|
3.50 | 100%1/1 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | 3.502-7-1 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB |
|
J
J. NeillBowler, 2 bowled
|
11.67 | 0%0/2 | -DNB | -DNB | 18.001-18-1 | 8.502-17-1 | -DNB |
Amsterdam Flames Team Economy
Amsterdam Flames Economy Match by Match
The last 10 ETPL matches and how often Amsterdam Flames kept under the line
| Opponent | Result | For | Ag | <8.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | 8.49 | 8.85 | 60% | |
 Belfast Wolves (H)19 Sep |
Lby 7 wickets | 7.35 | 6.65 | |
 Glasgow Cosmic (A)16 Sep |
Wby 5 wickets | 6.35 | 7.94 | |
 Dublin Guardians (H)15 Sep |
Wby 59 runs | 7.75 | 10.70 | |
 Edinburgh Castle Rockers (A)13 Sep |
Wby 8 wickets | 6.38 | 8.09 | |
| Belfast Wolves (A)10 Sep |
Lby 5 wickets | 7.58 | 7.05 | |
 Rotterdam Dockers (H)6 Sep |
Wby 8 wickets | 8.80 | 10.08 | |
| Dublin Guardians (A)5 Sep |
Wby 9 runs | 8.00 | 8.45 | |
| Glasgow Cosmic (H)3 Sep |
Wby 7 wickets | 8.55 | 10.51 | |
| Belfast Wolves (H)30 Aug |
Lby 9 wickets | 15.39 | 11.20 | |
| Rotterdam Dockers (A)26 Aug |
Lby 5 wickets | 8.70 | 7.85 |
Amsterdam Flames Economy Lines
How often they kept under each line, last 10 ETPL matches
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | 7 | 3 | 30% |
| 8 | 4 | 6 | 60% |
| 8.5 | 4 | 6 | 60% |
| 9 | 1 | 9 | 90% |
| 9.5 | 1 | 9 | 90% |
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|
Economy Batting First and Chasing
Amsterdam Flames's economy rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 6 | 2 | 9.13 | 8.65 |
| Second | 4 | 4 | 7.52 | 9.16 |
ETPL 2026 Economy Table
Economy rate, this season
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Edinburgh Castle Rockers |
10 | 7.49 | 8.43 |
| 2Amsterdam Flames |
10 | 7.89 | 8.64 |
| 3Belfast Wolves |
11 | 7.96 | 8.38 |
| 4Rotterdam Dockers |
9 | 8.40 | 8.45 |
| 5Dublin Guardians |
10 | 8.75 | 7.92 |
| 6Glasgow Cosmic |
10 | 8.88 | 7.59 |
Amsterdam Flames ETPL Economy Questions
What is Amsterdam Flames's economy rate in ETPL matches?
Amsterdam Flames's bowlers have conceded 7.89 runs an over over their last 10 ETPL matches, since August 2026, giving away 1,403 runs in 177.8 overs, while Amsterdam Flames have scored at 8.64 an over against them.
How often do Amsterdam Flames concede under 8.5 an over?
Amsterdam Flames conceded under 8.5 an over in 6 of their last 10 ETPL matches, since August 2026, 60% of the time, with an economy rate of 7.89 across those games.
Who is Amsterdam Flames's most economical bowler?
Michael Bracewell is Amsterdam Flames's most economical bowler over their last 10 ETPL matches, since August 2026, at 5.56 an over in 9 spells among those bowling three times or more, ahead of Aryan Dutt (6.14) and Tim Pringle (7.82).