Belfast Wolves Stats
Belfast Wolves ETPL Cricket Economy Rate Stats
How many runs an over Belfast Wolves concede, and who bowls tightest, game by game
Updated , after the Edinburgh Castle Rockers game
| Player | Avg | Hit % | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belfast Wolves total | 8.13 | 8.09 | 6.65 | 9.13 | 5.66 | 9.00 | 7.05 | 7.66 | 10.00 | 9.45 | 11.20 | |
G. MaxwellAll-rounder, 7 bowled
|
6.66 | 57%4/7 | 8.183.4-30-0 | 4.504-18-4 | 5.502-11-1 | 10.001-10-1 | -DNB | 7.001-7-0 | 2.001-2-1 | -DNB | 13.001-13-0 | -DNB |
|
G
G. HoeyAll-rounder, 3 bowled
|
6.88 | 67%2/3 | 7.504-30-1 | 9.001-9-0 | 5.333-16-1 | |||||||
F. KlaassenBowler, 10 bowled
|
6.98 | 70%7/10 | 5.502-11-0 | 5.333-16-0 | 14.673-44-0 | 5.002-10-0 | 5.673-17-0 | 4.004-16-2 | 8.293.3-29-0 | 7.754-31-4 | 5.504-22-2 | 10.001-10-1 |
H. ManentiBatter, 4 bowled
|
7.20 | 75%3/4 | 9.001-9-0 | -DNB | -DNB | 7.200.5-6-0 | 6.002-12-1 | -DNB | -DNB | 7.502-15-2 | ||
M. HumphreysBowler, 10 bowled
|
7.58 | 60%6/10 | 7.254-29-1 | 5.504-22-3 | 3.003-9-2 | 4.754-19-4 | 9.754-39-1 | 8.004-32-2 | 6.333-19-0 | 16.002-32-0 | 9.754-39-0 | 10.001-10-0 |
M. AdairBowler, 10 bowled
|
8.30 | 50%5/10 | 10.003-30-1 | 8.003-24-0 | 7.673-23-1 | 7.002-14-1 | 10.004-40-1 | 6.254-25-3 | 6.504-26-0 | 8.502-17-2 | 8.254-33-2 | 17.001-17-0 |
S. NetravalkarBowler, 5 bowled
|
9.25 | 20%1/5 | 10.003-30-0 | 12.333-37-0 | 3.754-15-2 | 11.003-33-1 | 11.003-33-1 | |||||
C. JordanBowler, 9 bowled
|
10.23 | 22%2/9 | 11.001-11-0 | 7.673-23-0 | 11.673-35-2 | 4.002-8-1 | 8.502-17-0 | 14.673-44-1 | 12.002-24-0 | 11.254-45-0 | 9.002-18-1 |
Belfast Wolves Team Economy
Belfast Wolves Economy Match by Match
The last 10 ETPL matches and how often Belfast Wolves kept under the line
| Opponent | Result | For | Ag | <8.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | 8.39 | 8.99 | 50% | |
 Edinburgh Castle Rockers (A)20 Sep |
Lby 7 wickets | 8.09 | 7.50 | |
 Amsterdam Flames (A)19 Sep |
Wby 7 wickets | 6.65 | 7.35 | |
| Edinburgh Castle Rockers (A)17 Sep |
Wby 9 runs | 9.13 | 9.50 | |
 Glasgow Cosmic (H)13 Sep |
Wby 103 runs | 5.66 | 9.35 | |
 Rotterdam Dockers (H)12 Sep |
Lby 7 wickets | 9.00 | 8.05 | |
| Amsterdam Flames (H)10 Sep |
Wby 5 wickets | 7.05 | 7.58 | |
 Dublin Guardians (A)9 Sep |
Lby 8 wickets | 7.66 | 5.44 | |
| Glasgow Cosmic (A)4 Sep |
Wby 26 runs | 10.00 | 12.17 | |
| Edinburgh Castle Rockers (H)2 Sep |
Lby 59 runs | 9.45 | 7.57 | |
| Amsterdam Flames (A)30 Aug |
Wby 9 wickets | 11.20 | 15.39 |
Belfast Wolves Economy Lines
How often they kept under each line, last 10 ETPL matches
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | 7 | 3 | 30% |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | 40% |
| 8.5 | 5 | 5 | 50% |
| 9 | 4 | 6 | 60% |
| 9.5 | 2 | 8 | 80% |
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|
Economy Batting First and Chasing
Belfast Wolves's economy rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 6 | 3 | 8.26 | 8.67 |
| Second | 4 | 3 | 8.59 | 9.47 |
ETPL 2026 Economy Table
Economy rate, this season
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Edinburgh Castle Rockers |
10 | 7.49 | 8.43 |
| 2Amsterdam Flames |
10 | 7.89 | 8.64 |
| 3Belfast Wolves |
11 | 7.96 | 8.38 |
| 4Rotterdam Dockers |
9 | 8.40 | 8.45 |
| 5Dublin Guardians |
10 | 8.75 | 7.92 |
| 6Glasgow Cosmic |
10 | 8.88 | 7.59 |
Belfast Wolves ETPL Economy Questions
What is Belfast Wolves's economy rate in ETPL matches?
Belfast Wolves's bowlers have conceded 8.13 runs an over over their last 10 ETPL matches, since August 2026, giving away 1,284 runs in 158.0 overs, while Belfast Wolves have scored at 8.29 an over against them.
How often do Belfast Wolves concede under 8.5 an over?
Belfast Wolves conceded under 8.5 an over in 5 of their last 10 ETPL matches, since August 2026, 50% of the time, with an economy rate of 8.13 across those games.
Who is Belfast Wolves's most economical bowler?
Glenn Maxwell is Belfast Wolves's most economical bowler over their last 10 ETPL matches, since August 2026, at 6.66 an over in 7 spells among those bowling three times or more, ahead of Gavin Hoey (6.88) and Frederick Klaassen (6.98).