Sussex Stats
Sussex Team Economy
Sussex Economy Match by Match
The last 10 T20 Blast matches and how often Sussex kept under the line
| Opponent | Result | For | Ag | <9.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | 9.39 | 8.51 | 30% | |
| Lby 4 wickets | 9.58 | 9.30 | ||
| Lby 100 runs | 10.20 | 5.94 | ||
| Lby 7 wickets | 11.29 | 8.77 | ||
| Wby 7 wickets | 6.65 | 7.79 | ||
| Lby 4 wickets | 10.19 | 9.03 | ||
| Lby 31 runs | 10.65 | 9.25 | ||
| Lby 7 runs | 10.20 | 9.85 | ||
| Lby 2 wickets | 7.74 | 7.46 | ||
| Lby 62 runs | 9.80 | 7.96 | ||
| Wby 78 runs | 7.63 | 9.75 |
Sussex Economy Lines
How often they kept under each line, last 10 T20 Blast matches
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | 7 | 3 | 30% |
| 9 | 7 | 3 | 30% |
| 9.5 | 7 | 3 | 30% |
| 10 | 5 | 5 | 50% |
| 10.5 | 2 | 8 | 80% |
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|
Economy Batting First and Chasing
Sussex's economy rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 5 | 1 | 9.29 | 8.86 |
| Second | 5 | 1 | 9.50 | 8.16 |
T20B 2026 Economy Table
Economy rate, this season
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
12 | 8.35 | 8.06 |
| 2 |
15 | 8.47 | 9.16 |
| 3 |
15 | 8.48 | 9.06 |
| 4 |
12 | 8.50 | 8.92 |
| 5 |
13 | 8.64 | 9.01 |
| 6 |
13 | 8.74 | 8.81 |
| 7 |
12 | 8.79 | 8.22 |
| 8 |
12 | 8.83 | 9.15 |
| 9 |
14 | 8.85 | 8.85 |
| 10 |
13 | 8.89 | 9.30 |
| 11 |
13 | 8.89 | 8.83 |
| 12 |
14 | 8.99 | 9.29 |
| 13 |
12 | 9.02 | 9.31 |
| 14 |
12 | 9.03 | 8.02 |
| 15 |
12 | 9.12 | 9.15 |
| 16 |
12 | 9.46 | 8.08 |
| 17 |
12 | 9.54 | 9.75 |
| 18 |
12 | 9.74 | 8.94 |
Sussex T20 Blast Economy Questions
What is Sussex's economy rate in T20 Blast matches?
Sussex's bowlers have conceded 9.39 runs an over in their last 10 T20 Blast matches, and Sussex have scored at 8.56 against them.
How often do Sussex concede under 9.5 an over?
Sussex conceded under 9.5 an over in 3 of their last 10 T20 Blast matches.
Who is Sussex's most economical bowler?
Over Sussex's last 10 T20 Blast matches, bowling three times or more: Nathan McAndrew (7.67 in 4 spells), Sean Hunt (7.88 in 4 spells), James Coles (8.59 in 6 spells).