Luxembourg Stats
Luxembourg T20I Cricket Strike Rate Stats
How fast Luxembourg score, and who bats quickest, game by game
Updated , after the Czech Republic game
| Player | Avg | Hit % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luxembourg total | 135.3 | 155.8 | 206.3 | 147.4 | 209.6 | 133.3 | 102.9 | 130.8 | 124.2 | 169.0 | 155.2 | 98.3 | 145.0 | 98.2 | 136.7 | 105.0 | 114.2 | 102.5 | 126.9 | 144.2 | 140.0 | |
|
A |
220.3 | 50%2/4 | 1299 (7) | 29235 (12) | 1299 (7) | 23288 (38) | ||||||||||||||||
|
W |
143.8 | 17%2/12 | 25551 (20) | -DNB | 12123 (19) | 1007 (7) | 00 (2) | 331 (3) | 18949 (26) | 00 (2) | 00 (1) | 201 (5) | 1004 (4) | 00 (1) | 332 (6) | |||||||
|
T |
140.4 | 59%10/17 | 00 (2) | 15021 (14) | 2259 (4) | 15420 (13) | 16566 (40) | 331 (3) | 18333 (18) | 00 (4) | 201 (5) | 14641 (28) | 15517 (11) | 00 (1) | 8713 (15) | 1338 (6) | 13833 (24) | 00 (1) | 16715 (9) | |||
|
V |
139.3 | 53%9/17 | 20048 (24) | -DNB | 16221 (13) | 21713 (6) | 17521 (12) | 00 (6) | 1148 (7) | 1002 (2) | 20453 (26) | 13539 (29) | 502 (4) | 14433 (23) | 505 (10) | 14616 (11) | 13943 (31) | 12244 (36) | 00 (3) | 333 (9) | ||
|
J |
133.3 | 25%2/8 | 1255 (4) | 16785 (51) | 00 (1) | 11714 (12) | 334 (12) | 501 (2) | 12624 (19) | 14423 (16) | ||||||||||||
|
G |
128.8 | 55%6/11 | 1338 (6) | 15247 (31) | 8923 (26) | 16436 (22) | -DNB | 14310 (7) | 672 (3) | 887 (8) | 9621 (22) | 16710 (6) | 1148 (7) | 20016 (8) | ||||||||
|
A |
127.4 | 43%3/7 | 9223 (25) | 15733 (21) | 444 (9) | 13630 (22) | 00 (3) | 20058 (29) | -DNB | 6710 (15) | ||||||||||||
|
|
118.4 | 33%1/3 | 13737 (27) | 10935 (32) | 11457 (50) | |||||||||||||||||
|
A |
117.9 | 17%2/12 | 00 (1) | 887 (8) | 15548 (31) | 00 (2) | 10716 (15) | 00 (4) | 10523 (22) | 10425 (24) | 00 (5) | 21824 (11) | 00 (1) | 13035 (27) | ||||||||
|
M |
117.7 | 29%2/7 | 835 (6) | -DNB | -DNB | 11011 (10) | -DNB | -DNB | 1148 (7) | 672 (3) | 2004 (2) | 14725 (17) | 10618 (17) | |||||||||
|
A |
116.7 | 25%1/4 | 1001 (1) | -DNB | -DNB | 1001 (1) | 00 (2) | 2505 (2) | -DNB | -DNB | ||||||||||||
|
A |
116.0 | 29%2/7 | -DNB | 17112 (7) | -DNB | 00 (3) | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | 00 (2) | -DNB | 1001 (1) | 201 (5) | 1002 (2) | 26013 (5) | -DNB | |||||
|
M |
112.5 | 33%1/3 | 10018 (18) | 00 (2) | 2259 (4) | |||||||||||||||||
|
J |
106.7 | 38%3/8 | 18333 (18) | -DNB | 5618 (32) | 2002 (1) | 8923 (26) | 2002 (1) | 9841 (42) | 12228 (23) | 12244 (36) | |||||||||||
|
|
100.5 | 15%3/20 | 674 (6) | 13332 (24) | 11219 (17) | 13615 (11) | 10027 (27) | 504 (8) | 11840 (34) | 6414 (22) | 738 (11) | 10732 (30) | 10949 (45) | 11840 (34) | 111 (9) | 12147 (39) | 678 (12) | 5310 (19) | 9735 (36) | 9339 (42) | 14014 (10) | 1004 (4) |
|
K |
92.3 | 25%1/4 | 1002 (2) | -DNB | 331 (3) | 1338 (6) | 501 (2) | |||||||||||||||
|
E |
89.1 | 13%1/8 | 603 (5) | -DNB | 753 (4) | 1001 (1) | 433 (7) | 22916 (7) | 333 (9) | 10912 (11) | 00 (2) | -DNB | ||||||||||
|
P |
73.8 | 17%1/6 | 508 (16) | -DNB | -DNB | 331 (3) | -DNB | 672 (3) | 12510 (8) | 2002 (1) | 738 (11) | -DNB | ||||||||||
|
V |
183.3 | 50%1/2 | 22011 (5) | 00 (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
147.4 | 50%1/2 | 10912 (11) | -DNB | 20016 (8) | -DNB | ||||||||||||||||
|
E |
146.7 | 50%1/2 | 10017 (17) | -DNB | 20827 (13) | -DNB | ||||||||||||||||
|
A |
146.2 | 100%1/1 | 14619 (13) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
100.0 | 0%0/1 | 1001 (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
T |
95.8 | 0%0/2 | 8012 (15) | 12211 (9) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
B |
89.7 | 0%0/1 | 9026 (29) | -DNB | ||||||||||||||||||
|
S |
50.0 | 0%0/1 | -DNB | -DNB | 501 (2) | -DNB | ||||||||||||||||
|
M |
0.0 | 0%0/1 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | 00 (2) | -DNB | |||||||||||||
Luxembourg Team Strike rate
Luxembourg Strike rate Match by Match
The last 20 T20Is and how often Luxembourg went over the line
Luxembourg Strike rate Lines
How often each line went over, last 20 T20Is
| Line | Over | Under | Over % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 125.5 | 13 | 7 | 65% |
| 130.5 | 12 | 8 | 60% |
| 135.5 | 10 | 10 | 50% |
| 140.5 | 8 | 12 | 40% |
| 145.5 | 6 | 14 | 30% |
| Line | Over | Under | Over % |
|---|
Strike rate Batting First and Chasing
Luxembourg's strike rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 5 | 0 | 113.6 | 152.0 |
| Second | 15 | 8 | 145.2 | 146.2 |
T20I Strike rate Table
Strike rate, sides with 8+ T20Is in the last two years
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
59 | 167.0 | 148.5 |
| 2 |
9 | 166.3 | 152.3 |
| 3 |
9 | 158.6 | 139.0 |
| 4 |
37 | 153.4 | 139.2 |
| 5 |
26 | 152.2 | 142.4 |
| 6 |
16 | 151.3 | 142.5 |
| 7 |
48 | 149.8 | 141.7 |
| 8 |
47 | 149.6 | 153.3 |
| 9 |
10 | 146.1 | 160.6 |
| 10 |
22 | 144.8 | 143.2 |
| 11 |
45 | 144.6 | 144.2 |
| 12 |
10 | 143.6 | 139.8 |
| 13 |
11 | 139.0 | 134.3 |
| 14 |
17 | 138.5 | 138.3 |
| 15 |
8 | 136.0 | 123.0 |
| 16 |
21 | 131.6 | 142.3 |
| 17 |
13 | 130.7 | 137.7 |
| 18 |
48 | 130.0 | 137.1 |
| 19 |
66 | 129.4 | 124.4 |
| 20 |
8 | 127.9 | 124.9 |
| 21 |
11 | 127.7 | 125.1 |
| 22 |
36 | 126.5 | 117.7 |
| 23 |
44 | 126.4 | 128.2 |
| 24 |
10 | 125.7 | 113.1 |
| 25 |
8 | 124.1 | 104.7 |
| 26 |
14 | 123.7 | 127.6 |
| 27 |
47 | 121.7 | 138.5 |
| 28 |
11 | 115.1 | 121.3 |
| 29 |
13 | 114.1 | 122.1 |
| 30 |
16 | 109.4 | 140.3 |
Luxembourg Strike rate by Competition
Strike rate per game in each T20I competition
| Competition | P | W-L | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 8-10 | 136.7 | 145.7 | |
| 2 | 0-2 | 142.1 | 165.9 |
Luxembourg T20I Strike rate Questions
What is Luxembourg's strike rate in T20Is?
Luxembourg have scored at a team strike rate of 135.3 runs per 100 balls over their last 20 T20Is, since July 2022, against their opponents' 147.0, from 2,980 runs off 2,203 balls.
How often do Luxembourg bat at a strike rate over 135.5?
Luxembourg batted at a strike rate over 135.5 in 10 of their last 20 T20Is, since July 2022, 50% of the time, with a team strike rate of 135.3 across those games.
Who has the best strike rate for Luxembourg?
Asghar Ali Khan has the best strike rate for Luxembourg over their last 20 T20Is, since July 2022, 220.3 in 4 innings among those batting three times or more, ahead of William Cope (143.8) and Timothy Barker (140.4).