WC Qualification Europe Expected Goals 2026

Belgium lead the WC Qualification Europe on expected points in 2026, with 25.5 xG created and 4.8 conceded across their matches. Georgia have the biggest gap between results and underlying numbers — 3 points from chances worth 7.9 xPts. The tables here cover 204 matches and sort on every column; the full expected-points table, with qualification and relegation places applied, lives in the xG view on the Table page.

Who the WC Qualification Europe xG table says is due a correction

Georgia have the biggest shortfall in the WC Qualification Europe: 3 points from chances worth 7.9 xPts, a gap of 4.9. At the other end, Turkey have taken 19 points from an xPts figure of 12.2, 6.8 more than the underlying numbers justify.

How these xG numbers are calculated

Expected goals measure the quality of the chances a team creates and concedes, with every shot scored between 0 and 1 by how often shots like it are converted. Expected points come from running each finished match through a Poisson model using both sides' xG, giving a win, draw and loss probability, then awarding three points and one point against those probabilities. Underlying data is supplied by Sportmonks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an xG table?

An xG table ranks clubs by the quality of the chances they create and concede rather than by the goals that happened to go in. Every shot is scored between 0 and 1 by how often shots like it are converted, and those values are summed into expected goals for (WC Qualification Europe xG) and against (xGA).

What does xPts mean?

Expected points. Each finished match is run through a Poisson model using both sides' xG, which produces a win, draw and loss probability; the team is then awarded three points and one point weighted by those probabilities. Summed across the season it estimates the points a club's performances were worth.

Why do some teams have far more points than xPts?

Usually a mix of clinical finishing, good goalkeeping and luck. Finishing skill is real but small and hard to sustain, so a large positive gap between points and xPts more often signals results that will drift back towards the underlying numbers than a permanently better team.

Where does the WC Qualification Europe xG data come from?

Shot-level data is supplied by Sportmonks and updates after every finished match, typically within a few hours of full-time. Different providers train their xG models on different data, so our figures will not match another site's exactly, though the ranking is generally similar.

WC Qualification Europe pages

  • WC Qualification Europe Table
  • WC Qualification Europe Team Stats
  • WC Qualification Europe Player Stats
  • WC Qualification Europe BTTS
  • WC Qualification Europe Corners
  • WC Qualification Europe Streaks
  • WC Qualification Europe Power Rankings
  • WC Qualification Europe Fixtures
  • WC Qualification Europe stats hub

Betting

  • Bet Builder Tips
  • Bet Builder picks by fixture

WC Qualification Europe 2026 xG table

# Team Played xG xGA xGD Points xPts Points minus xPts
1 Belgium 8 25.5 4.8 20.7 18 20.9 -2.9
2 England 8 20.8 2.4 18.4 24 20.3 +3.7
3 Croatia 8 24.9 5.2 19.7 22 19.6 +2.4
4 Italy 10 22.3 10.8 11.5 22 19.2 +2.8
5 Czech Republic 10 21.8 10.6 11.1 18 19.1 -1.1
6 Norway 8 25.4 4.9 20.6 24 18.6 +5.4
7 Netherlands 8 19.8 4.8 15.0 20 18.6 +1.4
8 Poland 10 18.2 11.3 6.9 20 18.0 +2.0
9 Denmark 8 17.7 6.6 11.1 15 17.1 -2.1
10 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10 19.1 12.1 7.0 19 17.0 +2.0
11 Spain 6 19.9 2.8 17.1 16 16.4 -0.4
12 Wales 9 18.7 11.3 7.3 17 16.3 +0.7
13 France 6 17.7 3.2 14.5 16 15.6 +0.4
14 Austria 8 19.8 7.6 12.2 19 15.5 +3.5
15 Romania 9 16.3 8.4 7.8 13 15.1 -2.1
16 Portugal 6 20.2 5.6 14.6 13 13.8 -0.8
17 Serbia 8 12.2 9.5 2.7 13 13.5 -0.5
18 Germany 6 13.4 3.8 9.6 15 13.2 +1.8
19 Turkey 8 11.3 10.5 0.8 19 12.2 +6.8
20 Albania 9 9.1 9.7 -0.5 14 12.2 +1.8
21 Cyprus 8 13.8 11.2 2.5 8 12.0 -4.0
22 Switzerland 6 9.0 3.4 5.5 14 11.9 +2.1
23 Israel 8 15.1 13.9 1.2 12 11.9 +0.1
24 Finland 8 12.7 12.4 0.3 10 10.7 -0.7
25 Montenegro 8 12.1 14.4 -2.2 9 10.4 -1.4
26 Kazakhstan 8 9.3 13.1 -3.8 8 10.2 -2.2
27 Slovakia 7 7.3 7.8 -0.5 12 9.9 +2.1
28 North Macedonia 9 9.9 16.1 -6.2 13 9.7 +3.3
29 Greece 6 9.8 7.4 2.4 7 9.6 -2.6
30 Sweden 8 9.0 11.1 -2.1 8 9.6 -1.6
31 Republic of Ireland 7 11.1 12.5 -1.3 11 9.5 +1.5
32 Kosovo 8 6.2 8.8 -2.6 14 9.1 +4.9
33 Faroe Islands 8 9.0 13.3 -4.3 12 8.9 +3.1
34 Scotland 6 9.3 8.7 0.6 13 8.6 +4.4
35 Ukraine 7 7.7 11.7 -4.1 10 8.3 +1.7
36 Northern Ireland 7 5.6 7.2 -1.6 9 8.2 +0.8
37 Iceland 6 7.7 8.6 -0.9 7 8.0 -1.0
38 Georgia 6 6.8 9.9 -3.1 3 7.9 -4.9
39 Hungary 6 8.7 10.8 -2.1 8 7.4 +0.6
40 Latvia 8 6.3 14.0 -7.7 5 7.4 -2.4
41 Slovenia 6 4.7 5.6 -0.9 4 7.2 -3.2
42 Malta 8 7.7 19.4 -11.8 5 6.4 -1.4
43 Estonia 8 6.3 19.4 -13.1 4 5.4 -1.4
44 Lithuania 8 5.3 15.5 -10.1 3 5.3 -2.3
45 Luxembourg 6 3.7 11.1 -7.4 0 4.4 -4.4
46 Armenia 6 4.7 16.4 -11.8 3 3.9 -0.9
47 Andorra 8 2.4 15.7 -13.2 1 3.2 -2.2
48 Moldova 8 4.7 26.2 -21.4 1 3.1 -2.1
49 Belarus 6 4.0 15.0 -11.0 2 2.8 -0.8
50 Azerbaijan 6 2.5 13.5 -11.0 1 2.6 -1.6
51 Bulgaria 6 2.0 15.3 -13.4 3 1.5 +1.5
52 Gibraltar 8 2.5 27.0 -24.5 0 1.5 -1.5
53 Liechtenstein 8 1.3 21.4 -20.1 0 1.3 -1.3
54 San Marino 8 3.6 31.9 -28.3 0 1.0 -1.0

Football

  • World Cup 2026
  • Premier League stats
  • Champions League stats
  • La Liga stats
  • Bundesliga stats
  • Serie A stats
  • Ligue 1 stats
  • All football leagues

Tools

  • Bet Builder
  • Team Bet Builder
  • Acca Builder
  • Same Game Parlay builder
  • Player prop projections
  • Form edges
  • Football news & analysis
  • Statz Pro

Company

  • About Statz
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of service