Thailand Women Stats
Thailand Women Team Economy
Thailand Women Economy Match by Match
The last 4 T20Is and how often Thailand Women kept under the line
| Opponent | Result | For | Ag | <6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | 5.85 | 6.21 | 75% | |
| Wby 8 wickets | 5.55 | 6.72 | ||
| Wby 8 wickets | 5.55 | 6.72 | ||
| Wby 5 wickets | 5.15 | 5.44 | ||
| Lby 24 runs | 7.15 | 5.95 |
Thailand Women Economy Lines
How often they kept under each line, last 4 T20Is
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 4 | 0 | 0% |
| 5.5 | 3 | 1 | 25% |
| 6 | 1 | 3 | 75% |
| 6.5 | 1 | 3 | 75% |
| 7 | 1 | 3 | 75% |
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|
Economy Batting First and Chasing
Thailand Women's economy rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 0 | 0 | - | - |
| Second | 4 | 3 | 5.85 | 6.21 |
T20I Economy Table
Economy rate, sides with 8+ T20Is in the last two years
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
18 | 7.01 | 9.02 |
| 2 |
23 | 7.27 | 7.83 |
| 3 |
24 | 7.48 | 8.42 |
| 4 |
29 | 7.48 | 7.28 |
| 5 |
19 | 7.52 | 7.27 |
| 6 |
19 | 7.52 | 7.95 |
| 7 |
18 | 7.53 | 6.58 |
| 8 |
9 | 7.57 | 7.87 |
| 9 |
32 | 7.66 | 8.10 |
| 10 |
20 | 7.67 | 7.27 |
| 11 |
32 | 7.71 | 8.84 |
| 12 |
9 | 9.24 | 6.85 |
| 13 |
22 | 9.35 | 5.75 |
Thailand Women T20I Economy Questions
What is Thailand Women's economy rate in T20Is?
Thailand Women's bowlers have conceded 5.85 runs an over over their last 4 T20Is, since April 2023, giving away 468 runs in 80.0 overs, while Thailand Women have scored at 6.16 an over against them.
How often do Thailand Women concede under 6 an over?
Thailand Women conceded under 6 an over in 3 of their last 4 T20Is, since April 2023, 75% of the time, with an economy rate of 5.85 across those games.
Who is Thailand Women's most economical bowler?
Thipatcha Putthawong is Thailand Women's most economical bowler over their last 4 T20Is, since April 2023, at 4.38 an over in 4 spells among those bowling three times or more, ahead of Nattaya Boochatham (4.53) and Suleeporn Laomi (4.94).