Namibia Stats
Namibia T20I Cricket Economy Rate Stats
How many runs an over Namibia concede, and who bowls tightest, game by game
Updated , after the South Africa game
| Player | Avg | Hit % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Namibia total | 7.53 | 10.45 | 7.84 | 13.06 | 8.11 | 7.00 | 9.31 | 6.85 | 5.45 | 9.00 | 9.88 | 4.81 | 7.65 | 7.71 | 10.00 | 6.05 | 5.68 | 4.96 | 7.85 | 7.51 | 6.10 | |
G. ErasmusBatter, 16 bowled
|
5.08 | 88%14/16 | 5.004-20-4 | 8.502-17-0 | 6.001-6-0 | 5.504-22-2 | 4.254-17-2 | -DNB | 2.333-7-3 | 5.004-20-1 | 3.254-13-1 | 5.254-21-2 | 6.003-18-1 | 7.254-29-2 | 3.754-15-3 | 8.001-8-0 | 3.003-9-2 | -DNB | 10.001-10-0 | 6.002-12-0 | ||
B. ScholtzBowler, 19 bowled
|
6.63 | 74%14/19 | 10.254-41-1 | 4.754-19-2 | -DNB | 5.004-20-4 | 7.004-28-1 | 4.502-9-1 | 7.254-29-0 | 6.673-20-1 | 9.003-27-1 | 10.754-43-2 | 2.754-11-3 | 8.504-34-0 | 6.333-19-0 | 9.004-36-0 | 6.254-25-1 | 4.504-18-2 | 4.504-18-1 | 6.254-25-3 | 6.254-25-1 | 6.004-24-0 |
D. WieseAll-rounder, 11 bowled
|
7.00 | 64%7/11 | 15.001-15-1 | 7.333-22-1 | 6.504-26-3 | 12.002-24-0 | 8.504-34-0 | 5.754-23-1 | 4.004-16-2 | 4.254-17-1 | 8.254-33-1 | 7.333-22-0 | 6.754-27-3 | |||||||||
J. FrylinckAll-rounder, 13 bowled
|
7.69 | 46%6/13 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | 12.001.1-14-0 | -DNB | -DNB | 10.502-21-0 | 9.004-36-2 | 9.303.2-31-1 | 4.754-19-1 | 4.003-12-1 | 9.673-29-1 | 9.673-29-1 | 6.504-26-2 | 6.254-25-2 | 9.754-39-1 | 7.003-21-1 | 5.673-17-2 |
J. Nicol Loftie-EatonAll-rounder, 7 bowled
|
7.69 | 43%3/7 | -DNB | 8.333-25-1 | 9.673-29-2 | -DNB | 5.001-5-0 | 18.001-18-1 | 3.673-11-1 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | 9.431.1-11-0 | 5.002-10-0 | ||||||||
T. LungameniBowler, 14 bowled
|
7.90 | 50%7/14 | 7.333-22-0 | 9.003-27-1 | 6.504-26-1 | 6.502-13-0 | 6.254-25-1 | 3.254-13-3 | 12.003-36-0 | 5.754-23-1 | 13.001-13-0 | 11.002-22-0 | 11.254-45-0 | 6.003-18-1 | 9.002-18-0 | 15.001-15-0 | ||||||
R. TrumpelmannBowler, 13 bowled
|
7.90 | 62%8/13 | 9.504-38-0 | 9.502-19-0 | 16.002-32-0 | 9.673-29-1 | 8.001-8-0 | 10.003-30-3 | 7.004-28-2 | 7.754-31-1 | 7.573.5-29-4 | 4.743.1-15-1 | 7.333-22-0 | 6.502-13-0 | 3.504-14-1 | |||||||
J. SmitAll-rounder, 7 bowled
|
8.00 | 57%4/7 | 12.504-50-1 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | 3.504-14-3 | 12.002-24-0 | 9.003-27-0 | 8.002-16-1 | 5.001-5-1 | 5.333-16-1 | |||||||||
B. ShikongoBowler, 10 bowled
|
8.96 | 50%5/10 | 13.673-41-1 | 19.001-19-0 | 6.002-12-0 | 7.004-28-3 | 10.502.4-28-1 | 11.502-23-0 | 7.002-14-1 | 7.333-22-2 | 9.001-9-1 | 5.333-16-0 | ||||||||||
D. LeicherBowler, 3 bowled
|
9.00 | 33%1/3 | -DNB | 13.001-13-0 | 9.502-19-1 | -DNB | 4.001-4-1 | |||||||||||||||
J. BrassellBatter, 5 bowled
|
10.57 | 20%1/5 | 9.673-29-1 | 21.000.4-14-0 | 8.802.3-22-1 | 8.001-8-0 | 11.254-45-2 | |||||||||||||||
P. Ya FranceBatter, 2 bowled
|
7.67 | 50%1/2 | -DNB | 8.502-17-1 | 6.001-6-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
H
H. KlazingeBowler, 2 bowled
|
8.67 | 0%0/2 | -DNB | 8.754-35-2 | 8.502-17-1 | |||||||||||||||||
J. BaltBatter, 1 bowled
|
9.43 | 0%0/1 | 9.431.1-11-1 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
P
P. BlignautBowler, 1 bowled
|
10.00 | 0%0/1 | 10.001-10-0 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
S
S. ShikongoBowler, 1 bowled
|
16.00 | 0%0/1 | 16.001-16-0 | |||||||||||||||||||
M. HeingoBowler, 1 bowled
|
18.00 | 0%0/1 | 18.001-18-0 | |||||||||||||||||||
A green cell is at or under the line. The line under an economy rate is the bowler's overs, runs and wickets; DNB did not bowl.
Namibia Team Economy
Line8
Avg7.537.35
Hit65%
Namibia Economy Match by Match
The last 20 T20Is and how often Namibia kept under the line
Line8
Namibia Economy Lines
How often they kept under each line, last 20 T20Is
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 12 | 8 | 40% |
| 7.5 | 12 | 8 | 40% |
| 8 | 7 | 13 | 65% |
| 8.5 | 6 | 14 | 70% |
| 9 | 5 | 15 | 75% |
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|
Economy Batting First and Chasing
Namibia's economy rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 12 | 6 | 7.99 | 7.25 |
| Second | 8 | 5 | 7.43 | 7.49 |
T20I Economy Table
Economy rate, sides with 8+ T20Is in the last two years
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
1 Malaysia |
8 | 6.28 | 7.44 |
2 Finland |
10 | 6.79 | 7.54 |
3 Afghanistan |
36 | 7.06 | 7.59 |
4 Norway |
11 | 7.28 | 6.91 |
5 Hong Kong |
13 | 7.32 | 6.85 |
6 Portugal |
8 | 7.38 | 8.16 |
7 Pakistan |
66 | 7.46 | 7.76 |
8 Cyprus |
8 | 7.49 | 7.67 |
9 Sweden |
11 | 7.51 | 7.66 |
10 Nepal |
14 | 7.66 | 7.42 |
11 Bangladesh |
44 | 7.69 | 7.58 |
12 Scotland |
11 | 8.06 | 8.34 |
13 Sri Lanka |
48 | 8.23 | 7.80 |
14 Netherlands |
13 | 8.26 | 7.84 |
15 Ireland |
17 | 8.30 | 8.31 |
16 Zimbabwe |
47 | 8.31 | 7.30 |
17 Romania |
9 | 8.34 | 9.51 |
18 England |
37 | 8.35 | 9.20 |
19 Switzerland |
10 | 8.39 | 8.61 |
20 Oman |
16 | 8.42 | 6.57 |
21 New Zealand |
48 | 8.50 | 8.99 |
22 United Arab Emirates |
21 | 8.54 | 7.90 |
23 Australia |
26 | 8.55 | 9.13 |
24 Austria |
16 | 8.55 | 9.08 |
| 25Namibia |
22 | 8.59 | 8.69 |
26 South Africa |
45 | 8.65 | 8.68 |
27 India |
59 | 8.91 | 10.02 |
28 Germany |
9 | 9.14 | 9.98 |
29 West Indies |
47 | 9.20 | 8.98 |
30 Hungary |
10 | 9.63 | 8.77 |
Namibia Economy by Competition
Economy rate per game in each T20I competition
| Competition | P | W-L | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 T20 Cricket World Cup | 3 | 1-2 | 9.73 | 6.22 |
 Tri-Nation Series | 3 | 1-2 | 8.91 | 8.22 |
| T20 Internationals | 14 | 9-5 | 7.10 | 7.40 |
Namibia T20I Economy Questions
What is Namibia's economy rate in T20Is?
Namibia's bowlers have conceded 7.53 runs an over over their last 20 T20Is, since May 2022, giving away 2,722 runs in 361.7 overs, while Namibia have scored at 7.35 an over against them.
How often do Namibia concede under 8 an over?
Namibia conceded under 8 an over in 13 of their last 20 T20Is, since May 2022, 65% of the time, with an economy rate of 7.53 across those games.
Who is Namibia's most economical bowler?
Gerhard Erasmus is Namibia's most economical bowler over their last 20 T20Is, since May 2022, at 5.08 an over in 16 spells among those bowling three times or more, ahead of Bernard Scholtz (6.63) and David Wiese (7.00).