South Africa Stats
South Africa T20I Economy Rate Stats
How many runs an over South Africa concede, and who bowls tightest, game by game
Updated 6 September 2026, after the Zimbabwe game
| Player | Avg | Hit % | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Africa total | 8.23 | 8.72 | 10.85 | 8.04 | 7.20 | 8.15 | 7.70 | 7.70 | 8.39 | 8.75 | 6.28 | |
G. CoetzeeAll-rounder, 5 bowled
|
6.21 | 80%4/5 | 5.254-21-2 | 8.093.5-31-3 | 5.754-23-0 | 7.004-28-1 | 4.673-14-2 | |||||
B. FortuinBowler, 5 bowled
|
6.32 | 80%4/5 | 6.004-24-3 | 9.333-28-0 | 6.553.4-24-4 | 6.254-25-1 | 4.254-17-2 | |||||
E. BoschBowler, 4 bowled
|
7.38 | 75%3/4 | 7.333-22-2 | 10.754-43-0 | 5.502-11-0 | 5.004-20-1 | ||||||
K. MaphakaBowler, 4 bowled
|
7.43 | 50%2/4 | 4.502-9-1 | 9.504-38-0 | 8.254-33-0 | 6.004-24-1 | ||||||
P. SubrayenAll-rounder, 6 bowled
|
7.48 | 67%4/6 | 10.254-41-1 | 11.002-22-1 | 6.754-27-2 | 8.004-32-3 | 5.504-22-0 | 4.333-13-2 | ||||
O. BaartmanBowler, 4 bowled
|
7.73 | 75%3/4 | 8.254-33-2 | 7.504-30-2 | 7.754-31-1 | 7.333-22-2 | ||||||
W. MulderAll-rounder, 4 bowled
|
8.56 | 50%2/4 | 9.333-28-2 | 10.003-30-1 | 5.001-5-0 | 7.002-14-2 | ||||||
|
N
N. MokoenaBatter, 6 bowled
|
8.59 | 33%2/6 | 10.002-20-0 | 10.754-43-2 | 9.754-39-1 | 8.673-26-0 | 5.504-22-0 | 7.433.3-26-3 | ||||
G. LindeAll-rounder, 4 bowled
|
9.00 | 50%2/4 | 5.502-11-0 | 15.001-15-0 | 7.333-22-0 | 11.003-33-1 | -DNB | |||||
D. JansenBowler, 4 bowled
|
9.07 | 50%2/4 | 12.673-38-3 | 5.254-21-3 | 11.254-45-3 | 8.004-32-2 | ||||||
K. MaharajBowler, 5 bowled
|
9.24 | 40%2/5 | 11.673-35-1 | 5.504-22-2 | 10.003-30-1 | 15.003-45-1 | 6.254-25-2 | |||||
|
D
D. ForresterBatter, 1 bowled
|
4.00 | 100%1/1 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | 4.001-4-0 | |||||
J. HermannBatter, 1 bowled
|
6.00 | 100%1/1 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | 6.000.3-3-0 | |||||
L. SipamlaBowler, 2 bowled
|
10.96 | 0%0/2 | 10.671.3-16-0 | 11.142.2-26-1 | ||||||||
|
N
N. PeterBowler, 2 bowled
|
11.00 | 0%0/2 | 8.673-26-0 | 14.502-29-1 | ||||||||
D. BrevisBatter, 1 bowled
|
11.00 | 0%0/1 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | 11.002-22-1 | |||||
A. SimelaneAll-rounder, 1 bowled
|
14.00 | 0%0/1 | 14.002-28-1 | |||||||||
A green cell is at or under the line. The line under an economy rate is the bowler's overs, runs and wickets; DNB did not bowl.
South Africa Team Economy
Line8
Avg8.238.60
Hit40%
South Africa Economy Match by Match
The last 10 T20Is and how often South Africa kept under the line
Line8
| Opponent | Result | For | Ag | <8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | 8.18 | 8.58 | 40% | |
 Zimbabwe (H)TRI, 6 Sep |
Wby 48 runs | 8.72 | 10.25 | |
 Namibia (A)TRI, 4 Sep |
Wby 11 runs | 10.85 | 11.40 | |
| Zimbabwe (H)TRI, 1 Sep |
Wby 43 runs | 8.04 | 9.25 | |
| Zimbabwe (H)TRI, 29 Aug |
Wby 7 wickets | 7.20 | 10.68 | |
| Namibia (A)TRI, 28 Aug |
Lby 18 runs | 8.15 | 7.34 | |
 New Zealand (A)T20I, 25 Mar |
Wby 33 runs | 7.70 | 9.35 | |
| New Zealand (A)T20I, 22 Mar |
Wby 19 runs | 7.70 | 8.20 | |
| New Zealand (A)T20I, 20 Mar |
Lby 8 wickets | 8.39 | 6.80 | |
| New Zealand (A)T20I, 17 Mar |
Lby 68 runs | 8.75 | 6.90 | |
| New Zealand (A)T20I, 15 Mar |
Wby 7 wickets | 6.28 | 5.58 |
Bangladesh Economy Match by Match
South Africa's next opponent, their last 10 T20Is
| Opponent | Result | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | 7.86 | 6.90 | |
 Afghanistan (A)TRI, 21 Oct |
Lby 7 wickets | 4.54 | 3.87 |
| Zimbabwe (H)TRI, 17 Oct |
Lby 99 runs | 5.42 | 5.11 |
 Sri Lanka (H)T20I, 3 Oct |
Lby 63 runs | 8.25 | 5.83 |
 Pakistan (H)T20I, 1 Oct |
Lby 6 wickets | 9.74 | 8.54 |
| Zimbabwe (A)T20I, 19 Jul |
Wby 4 wickets | 7.15 | 7.32 |
| Zimbabwe (A)T20I, 17 Jul |
Wby 34 runs | 7.73 | 9.30 |
| Zimbabwe (A)T20I, 15 Jul |
Lby 32 runs | 8.50 | 7.26 |
 Australia (H)T20I, 21 Jun |
Lby 7 wickets | 10.18 | 5.45 |
| Australia (H)T20I, 19 Jun |
Lby 7 runs | 9.80 | 9.45 |
| Australia (H)T20I, 17 Jun |
Lby 4 wickets | 7.25 | 6.89 |
South Africa Economy Lines
How often they kept under each line, last 10 T20Is
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 9 | 1 | 10% |
| 7.5 | 8 | 2 | 20% |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | 40% |
| 8.5 | 3 | 7 | 70% |
| 9 | 1 | 9 | 90% |
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|
Economy Batting First and Chasing
South Africa's economy rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 6 | 5 | 8.57 | 9.21 |
| Second | 4 | 2 | 7.60 | 7.63 |
T20I Economy Table
Economy rate, sides with 8+ T20Is in the last two years
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
1 Malaysia |
8 | 6.28 | 7.44 |
2 Finland |
10 | 6.79 | 7.54 |
| 3Afghanistan |
36 | 7.06 | 7.59 |
4 Norway |
11 | 7.28 | 6.91 |
5 Hong Kong |
13 | 7.32 | 6.85 |
6 Portugal |
8 | 7.38 | 8.16 |
| 7Pakistan |
66 | 7.46 | 7.76 |
8 Cyprus |
8 | 7.49 | 7.67 |
9 Sweden |
11 | 7.51 | 7.66 |
10 Nepal |
14 | 7.66 | 7.42 |
11 Bangladesh |
44 | 7.69 | 7.58 |
12 Scotland |
11 | 8.06 | 8.34 |
| 13Sri Lanka |
48 | 8.23 | 7.80 |
14 Netherlands |
13 | 8.26 | 7.84 |
15 Ireland |
17 | 8.30 | 8.31 |
| 16Zimbabwe |
47 | 8.31 | 7.30 |
17 Romania |
9 | 8.34 | 9.51 |
18 England |
37 | 8.35 | 9.20 |
19 Switzerland |
10 | 8.39 | 8.61 |
20 Oman |
16 | 8.42 | 6.57 |
| 21New Zealand |
48 | 8.50 | 8.99 |
22 United Arab Emirates |
21 | 8.54 | 7.90 |
| 23Australia |
26 | 8.55 | 9.13 |
24 Austria |
16 | 8.55 | 9.08 |
| 25Namibia |
22 | 8.59 | 8.69 |
| 26South Africa |
45 | 8.65 | 8.68 |
27 India |
59 | 8.91 | 10.02 |
28 Germany |
9 | 9.14 | 9.98 |
29 West Indies |
47 | 9.20 | 8.98 |
30 Hungary |
10 | 9.63 | 8.77 |
South Africa Economy by Competition
Economy rate per game in each T20I competition
| Competition | P | W-L | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Tri-Nation Series | 5 | 4-1 | 8.59 | 9.78 |
| T20 Internationals | 5 | 3-2 | 7.76 | 7.37 |
South Africa T20I Economy Questions
What is South Africa's economy rate in T20Is?
South Africa's bowlers have conceded 8.23 runs an over in their last 10 T20Is, and South Africa have scored at 8.60 against them.
How often do South Africa concede under 8 an over?
South Africa conceded under 8 an over in 4 of their last 10 T20Is.
Who is South Africa's most economical bowler?
Over South Africa's last 10 T20Is, bowling three times or more: Gerald Coetzee (6.21 in 5 spells), Bjorn Fortuin (6.32 in 5 spells), Eathan Bosch (7.38 in 4 spells).