Hyderabad Kingsmen Stats
Hyderabad Kingsmen Team Economy
Hyderabad Kingsmen Economy Match by Match
The last 13 PSL matches and how often Hyderabad Kingsmen kept under the line
| Opponent | Result | For | Ag | <9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | 9.07 | 8.74 | 54% | |
| Lby 5 wickets | 8.48 | 7.17 | ||
| Wby 2 runs | 9.20 | 9.30 | ||
| Wby 8 wickets | 7.95 | 10.57 | ||
| Wby 108 runs | 7.92 | 12.20 | ||
| Lby 8 wickets | 12.45 | 5.05 | ||
| Wby 4 wickets | 10.65 | 10.97 | ||
| Wby 5 wickets | 6.05 | 7.45 | ||
| Wby 6 wickets | 7.65 | 8.64 | ||
| Wby 4 wickets | 9.40 | 9.86 | ||
| Lby 4 wickets | 7.30 | 7.91 | ||
| Lby 6 wickets | 12.16 | 11.25 | ||
| Lby 40 runs | 8.70 | 6.70 | ||
| Lby 69 runs | 9.95 | 6.50 |
Hyderabad Kingsmen Economy Lines
How often they kept under each line, last 13 PSL matches
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 8 | 5 | 38% |
| 8.5 | 7 | 6 | 46% |
| 9 | 6 | 7 | 54% |
| 9.5 | 4 | 9 | 69% |
| 10 | 3 | 10 | 77% |
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|
Economy Batting First and Chasing
Hyderabad Kingsmen's economy rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 6 | 2 | 9.59 | 8.81 |
| Second | 7 | 5 | 8.62 | 8.67 |
PSL 2026 Economy Table
Economy rate, this season
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
11 | 8.10 | 10.04 |
| 2 |
11 | 8.31 | 9.17 |
| 3 |
13 | 8.88 | 8.79 |
| 4 |
10 | 8.97 | 8.66 |
| 5 |
10 | 9.05 | 8.78 |
| 6 |
10 | 9.62 | 8.80 |
| 7 |
10 | 9.91 | 8.35 |
| 8 |
11 | 9.97 | 10.01 |
Hyderabad Kingsmen PSL Economy Questions
What is Hyderabad Kingsmen's economy rate in PSL matches?
Hyderabad Kingsmen's bowlers have conceded 8.88 runs an over in their last 13 PSL matches, and Hyderabad Kingsmen have scored at 8.79 against them.
How often do Hyderabad Kingsmen concede under 9 an over?
Hyderabad Kingsmen conceded under 9 an over in 7 of their last 13 PSL matches.
Who is Hyderabad Kingsmen's most economical bowler?
Over Hyderabad Kingsmen's last 13 PSL matches, bowling three times or more: Maheesh Theekshana (8.17 in 3 spells), Saim Ayub (8.28 in 12 spells), Mohammad Ali (8.36 in 12 spells).