What were the final scores in Middlesex vs Essex?

Middlesex scored 116/2 in 12.3 overs. Essex scored 237/6 in 20 overs.

Who was the Statz MVP in Middlesex vs Essex?

Daniel Sams was named Statz MVP, earning a Statz Rating of 133/100. The Statz Rating combines batting impact, bowling impact and match context.

Who was the top run-scorer in Middlesex vs Essex?

Daniel Sams top-scored with 67 off 24 balls.

Who took the most wickets in Middlesex vs Essex?

Martin Andersson took 3/38 in 4 overs.

Where was Middlesex vs Essex played?

The match was played at Lord's, London.

Who played in Middlesex vs Essex?

Middlesex XI: Jack Davies, Joe Cracknell, John Simpson, Josh de Caires, Luke Hollman, Martin Andersson, Max Holden, Nathan Fernandes, Ryan Higgins, Stevie Eskinazi, Tom Helm. Essex XI: Daniel Lawrence, Daniel Sams, Feroze Khushi, Matthew Critchley, Michael Pepper, Paul Walter, Robin Das, Samuel Cook, Shane Snater, Simon Harmer, William Buttleman.

Home /
Fixtures /
Middlesex vs Essex

Middlesex vs Essex — Essex won by 22 runs (D/L method)

Q: Who won Middlesex vs Essex?

Essex won by 22 runs (D/L method).

T20 Blast • Match South Group

Result

Result

Essex won by 22 runs (D/L method)

Statz MVP

Daniel Sams

133

Rating

Leading Run Scorer James Vince 670 runs · Leading Wicket Taker Matt Henry 31 wkts · Standings →

Lord's, London

Lord's

London, England

Full Stats →

Based on the last 14 T20 matches at this venue (since Jun 2022). Rain-shortened matches excluded.

Avg Total Runs

334.6

Avg 1st Inn

178.8

Avg 2nd Inn

155.8

Avg Sixes

11.6

Avg Fours

28.6

Bat 1st Win %

71%

Boundary %

55.0%

Seam Econ

9.02

Spin Econ

8.11

Recent Matches at This Venue

Match	1st Inn	2nd Inn	Total
MID vs SUR 20 Jun 2024	185/9 (20)	129/8 (20)	314
MID vs SUS 29 May 2025	202/4 (20)	186/7 (20)	388
MID vs KEN 05 Jun 2025	172/9 (20)	172/? (-)	344
MID vs ESS 19 Jun 2025	161/10 (19.5)	160/6 (20)	321
MID vs SUR 16 Jul 2025	189/9 (20)	181/6 (20)	370

MID at Lord's

Won

Lost

Avg Score 16.6

Highest Score 121

Top Scorer

Stevie Eskinazi 357 runs

Top Wicket-Taker

Tom Helm 17 wkts

ESS at Lord's

Won

Lost

Avg Score 21.5

Highest Score 67

Top Scorer

Michael Pepper 138 runs

Top Wicket-Taker

Simon Harmer 4 wkts

Essex · Innings 1

Daniel Lawrence

c Ryan Higgins b Martin Andersson

53 (30)

5×4 · 3×6 · SR 176.67

Feroze Khushi

c Ryan Higgins b Martin Andersson

7 (7)

1×4 · 0×6 · SR 100

Michael Pepper

c Luke Hollman b Martin Andersson

64 (34)

6×4 · 4×6 · SR 188.24

Robin Das

b Josh de Caires

7 (9)

0×4 · 0×6 · SR 77.78

Paul Walter

c Luke Hollman b Tom Helm

19 (15)

0×4 · 2×6 · SR 126.67

Daniel Sams

c Nathan Fernandes b Nathan Fernandes

67 (24)

2×4 · 8×6 · SR 279.17

Matthew Critchley

not out

3* (2)

0×4 · 0×6 · SR 150

Simon Harmer (c)

not out

2* (1)

0×4 · 0×6 · SR 200

Batter	Dismissal	R	B	4s	6s	SR
Daniel Lawrence	c Ryan Higgins b Martin Andersson	53	30	5	3	176.67
Feroze Khushi	c Ryan Higgins b Martin Andersson	7	7	1	0	100
Michael Pepper	c Luke Hollman b Martin Andersson	64	34	6	4	188.24
Robin Das	b Josh de Caires	7	9	0	0	77.78
Paul Walter	c Luke Hollman b Tom Helm	19	15	0	2	126.67
Daniel Sams	c Nathan Fernandes b Nathan Fernandes	67	24	2	8	279.17
Matthew Critchley	not out	3*	2	0	0	150
Simon Harmer (c)	not out	2*	1	0	0	200

Total

237/6 (20 ov)

DNB Samuel Cook, Shane Snater, William Buttleman (wk)

FoW 1-47 (Feroze Khushi, 4.5 ov), 2-83 (Daniel Lawrence, 8.1 ov), 3-135 (Michael Pepper, 12.6 ov), 4-143 (Robin Das, 13.4 ov), 5-205 (Paul Walter, 18.1 ov), 6-235 (Daniel Sams, 19.5 ov)

Middlesex · Bowling

Tom Helm

4-0-37-1 · Econ 9.25

1/37

wd 2 · nb 1

Josh de Caires

3-0-37-1 · Econ 12.33

1/37

3 ov

Nathan Fernandes

3-0-45-1 · Econ 15

1/45

wd 1 · nb 0

Martin Andersson

4-0-38-3 · Econ 9.5

3/38

wd 1 · nb 1

Luke Hollman

3-0-37-0 · Econ 12.33

0/37

3 ov

Ryan Higgins

3-0-36-0 · Econ 12

0/36

3 ov

Bowler	O	R	W	Econ	Wd	Nb
Tom Helm	4	37	1	9.25	2	1
Josh de Caires	3	37	1	12.33	0	0
Nathan Fernandes	3	45	1	15	1	0
Martin Andersson	4	38	3	9.5	1	1
Luke Hollman	3	37	0	12.33	0	0
Ryan Higgins	3	36	0	12	0	0

Middlesex · Innings 2

Stevie Eskinazi (c)

b Daniel Sams

28 (20)

2×4 · 2×6 · SR 140

Joe Cracknell

not out

36* (33)

3×4 · 0×6 · SR 109.09

Ryan Higgins

c Daniel Sams b Daniel Lawrence

32 (22)

1×4 · 3×6 · SR 145.45

Max Holden

not out

6* (2)

0×4 · 1×6 · SR 300

Batter	Dismissal	R	B	4s	6s	SR
Stevie Eskinazi (c)	b Daniel Sams	28	20	2	2	140
Joe Cracknell	not out	36*	33	3	0	109.09
Ryan Higgins	c Daniel Sams b Daniel Lawrence	32	22	1	3	145.45
Max Holden	not out	6*	2	0	1	300

Total

116/2 (12.3 ov)

DNB Jack Davies, John Simpson (wk), Josh de Caires, Luke Hollman, Martin Andersson, Nathan Fernandes, Tom Helm

FoW 1-47 (Stevie Eskinazi, 5.5 ov), 2-107 (Ryan Higgins, 11.5 ov)

Essex · Bowling

Samuel Cook

2-0-17-0 · Econ 8.5

0/17

wd 1 · nb 0

Daniel Sams

2-0-15-1 · Econ 7.5

1/15

wd 2 · nb 0

Shane Snater

2.3-0-19-0 · Econ 8.26

0/19

wd 1 · nb 1

Paul Walter

2-0-10-0 · Econ 5

0/10

2 ov

Simon Harmer (c)

1-0-18-0 · Econ 18

0/18

wd 0 · nb 1

Matthew Critchley

2-0-22-0 · Econ 11

0/22

wd 1 · nb 0

Daniel Lawrence

1-0-11-1 · Econ 11

1/11

wd 1 · nb 0

Bowler	O	R	W	Econ	Wd	Nb
Samuel Cook	2	17	0	8.5	1	0
Daniel Sams	2	15	1	7.5	2	0
Shane Snater	2.3	19	0	8.26	1	1
Paul Walter	2	10	0	5	0	0
Simon Harmer (c)	1	18	0	18	0	1
Matthew Critchley	2	22	0	11	1	0
Daniel Lawrence	1	11	1	11	1	0

Statz Rating

A contextual performance score measuring each player's overall impact in the match. Scaled against the season so ratings are directly comparable across fixtures.

Rank	Player	Rating
1	Daniel Sams ESS	133.3
2	Martin Andersson MID	93.3
3	Michael Pepper ESS	71.6
4	Daniel Lawrence ESS	66.9
5	Ryan Higgins MID	55.4
6	Stevie Eskinazi MID	41.2
7	Tom Helm MID	35.9
8	Joe Cracknell MID	35.3
9	Paul Walter ESS	31.5
10	Josh de Caires MID	23.3
11	Nathan Fernandes MID	17.1
12	Max Holden MID	11.1
13	Robin Das ESS	8.0
14	Luke Hollman MID	7.8
15	Feroze Khushi ESS	7.1
16	Matthew Critchley ESS	7.0
17	Samuel Cook ESS	6.7
18	Shane Snater ESS	6.0
19	Simon Harmer ESS	3.5

How Statz Rating works:

Each player receives a contextual match impact score based on their all-round contribution — batting, bowling, and situational factors.
Ratings are scaled against the season benchmark so they are directly comparable across fixtures and to the season leaderboard.
A typical top performer scores around 100. Exceptional performances can exceed 100.

Middlesex vs Essex — Essex won by 22 runs (D/L method)

Head-to-Head Record

MID Form

ESS Form

Season Comparison

Active Streaks

Top Performers in H2H

Lord's