MI London Stats
MI London Hundred Economy Rate Stats
How many runs an over MI London concede, and who bowls tightest, game by game
Updated 12 August 2026, after the Birmingham Phoenix game
| Player | Avg | Hit % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI London total | 8.64 | 9.87 | 8.72 | 11.12 | 8.67 | 8.52 | 9.12 | 10.26 | 9.23 | 7.68 | 7.80 | 6.26 | 7.08 | 8.70 | 6.59 | 8.88 | 11.22 | 6.20 | 8.28 | 9.96 | 8.22 | |
S. JohnsonBowler, 6 bowled
|
4.80 | 83%5/6 | 7.200.5-6-0 | 5.103.2-17-0 | 3.003.2-10-1 | 7.201.4-12-1 | 10.402.3-26-0 | 0.303.2-1-3 | ||||||||||||||
S. NarineBowler, 4 bowled
|
6.16 | 75%3/4 | 3.603.2-12-3 | 10.002.3-25-0 | 6.303.2-21-2 | 5.703.2-19-0 | ||||||||||||||||
A. ZampaBowler, 8 bowled
|
6.64 | 88%7/8 | 6.303.2-21-1 | 7.803.2-26-2 | 5.103.2-17-4 | 9.603.2-32-1 | 7.803.2-26-1 | 3.303.2-11-3 | 6.003.2-20-2 | 7.203.2-24-2 | ||||||||||||
R. KhanBowler, 6 bowled
|
7.25 | 67%4/6 | 5.103.2-17-5 | 6.003.2-20-0 | 10.203.2-34-1 | 5.703.2-19-2 | 10.803.2-36-1 | 5.703.2-19-3 | ||||||||||||||
W. JacksBatter, 11 bowled
|
7.53 | 36%4/11 | 9.601.4-16-0 | 4.800.5-4-0 | 14.400.5-12-0 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | 10.800.5-9-0 | 8.401.4-14-1 | 4.802.3-12-1 | 1.200.5-1-1 | 8.400.5-7-0 | 4.801.4-8-2 | 9.600.5-8-0 | 8.802.3-22-2 | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB | -DNB |
G. AtkinsonAll-rounder, 3 bowled
|
7.93 | 67%2/3 | 8.403.2-28-1 | 7.583.1-24-2 | 7.803.2-26-3 | |||||||||||||||||
T. BoultBowler, 4 bowled
|
7.97 | 50%2/4 | 6.303.2-21-0 | 9.603.2-32-1 | 11.053.1-35-1 | 5.103.2-17-1 | ||||||||||||||||
N. SowterAll-rounder, 18 bowled
|
8.27 | 61%11/18 | 9.600.5-8-0 | 6.903.2-23-1 | 6.601.4-11-0 | 7.503.2-25-3 | 6.903.2-23-2 | 6.802.3-17-1 | 15.001.4-25-0 | 6.802.3-17-0 | 7.202.3-18-1 | 8.703.2-29-0 | 6.402.3-16-0 | 11.401.4-19-0 | 7.882.4-21-1 | 10.801.4-18-1 | 11.202.3-28-1 | 10.203.2-34-2 | 6.000.5-5-0 | 5.401.4-9-0 | ||
J. BehrendorffBowler, 5 bowled
|
8.80 | 40%2/5 | 9.601.4-16-0 | 9.003.2-30-1 | 11.202.3-28-1 | 8.002.3-20-3 | 6.402.3-16-2 | |||||||||||||||
S. MahmoodAll-rounder, 8 bowled
|
8.86 | 25%2/8 | 4.002.3-10-1 | 11.703.2-39-0 | 15.001.4-25-0 | 8.402.3-21-1 | 10.402.3-26-2 | 5.103.2-17-3 | 8.703.2-29-1 | 10.002.3-25-2 | ||||||||||||
R. GleesonBowler, 4 bowled
|
9.28 | 25%1/4 | 8.103.2-27-2 | 14.401.4-24-1 | 9.202.3-23-1 | 7.893.1-25-4 | ||||||||||||||||
S. CurranAll-rounder, 18 bowled
|
9.34 | 28%5/18 | 11.403.2-38-0 | -DNB | 10.802.3-27-2 | 9.303.2-31-0 | 9.003.2-30-1 | 12.303.2-41-0 | 8.002.3-20-1 | 5.103.2-17-2 | 7.503.2-25-0 | 4.002.3-10-3 | 8.403.2-28-2 | 8.002.3-20-2 | 16.800.5-14-0 | 10.002.3-25-0 | 12.003.2-40-1 | 10.201.4-17-0 | 9.903.2-33-0 | 12.402.3-31-0 | 8.403.2-28-1 | |
T. CurranAll-rounder, 17 bowled
|
9.92 | 24%4/17 | 13.201.4-22-1 | 11.403.2-38-2 | 12.402.3-31-0 | 11.202.3-28-1 | 13.602.3-34-1 | 8.103.2-27-2 | 11.103.2-37-2 | 5.003-15-4 | 12.001.4-20-0 | 11.202.3-28-0 | 7.412.5-21-2 | 7.203.2-24-4 | 17.401.4-29-0 | 9.303.2-31-2 | 8.103.2-27-2 | 12.903.2-43-0 | 4.803.2-16-0 | |||
M. AmirBowler, 1 bowled
|
2.80 | 100%1/1 | 2.802.3-7-2 | |||||||||||||||||||
R. TopleyBowler, 1 bowled
|
7.20 | 100%1/1 | 7.203.2-24-3 | |||||||||||||||||||
S. RazaAll-rounder, 1 bowled
|
8.40 | 0%0/1 | 8.400.5-7-0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Z. ChappellAll-rounder, 2 bowled
|
9.60 | 50%1/2 | 16.402.3-41-1 | 4.503.2-15-1 | ||||||||||||||||||
M. MilnesAll-rounder, 1 bowled
|
9.60 | 0%0/1 | 9.603.2-32-3 | |||||||||||||||||||
M. HasnainBowler, 2 bowled
|
10.40 | 0%0/2 | 10.002.3-25-1 | 10.802.3-27-1 | ||||||||||||||||||
D. BriggsAll-rounder, 1 bowled
|
13.20 | 0%0/1 | 13.200.5-11-0 | |||||||||||||||||||
O. StoneBowler, 1 bowled
|
15.60 | 0%0/1 | 15.602.3-39-1 | |||||||||||||||||||
A green cell is at or under the line. The line under an economy rate is the bowler's overs, runs and wickets; DNB did not bowl.
MI London Team Economy
Line8.5
Avg8.6410.12
Hit40%
MI London Economy Match by Match
The last 20 matches and how often MI London kept under the line
Line8.5
MI London Economy Lines
How often they kept under each line, last 20 matches
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | 16 | 4 | 20% |
| 8 | 14 | 6 | 30% |
| 8.5 | 12 | 8 | 40% |
| 9 | 7 | 13 | 65% |
| 9.5 | 5 | 15 | 75% |
| Line | Over | Under | Under % |
|---|
Economy Batting First and Chasing
MI London's economy rate per game by when they batted
| Batting | P | W | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 8 | 6 | 9.09 | 10.58 |
| Second | 12 | 9 | 8.31 | 9.89 |
100 2026 Economy Table
Economy rate, this season
| Side | P | For | Ag |
|---|---|---|---|
1 Southern Brave |
8 | 8.40 | 8.30 |
2 Trent Rockets |
9 | 9.06 | 9.80 |
3 Manchester Super Giants |
10 | 9.15 | 10.12 |
| 4MI London |
8 | 9.35 | 9.57 |
5 Welsh Fire |
8 | 9.38 | 8.30 |
6 London Spirit |
8 | 9.62 | 9.60 |
7 Birmingham Phoenix |
8 | 9.97 | 8.42 |
8 Sunrisers Leeds |
9 | 10.05 | 10.55 |
MI London Hundred Economy Questions
What is MI London's economy rate in matches?
MI London's bowlers have conceded 8.64 runs an over in their last 20 matches, and MI London have scored at 10.12 against them.
How often do MI London concede under 8.5 an over?
MI London conceded under 8.5 an over in 8 of their last 20 matches.
Who is MI London's most economical bowler?
Over MI London's last 20 matches, bowling three times or more: Spencer Johnson (4.80 in 6 spells), Sunil Narine (6.16 in 4 spells), Adam Zampa (6.64 in 8 spells).